News Alert | Even the “Save the Star Association”, which supports the FCSB, announces that the “UEFA letter” is a fake

  • F1: Azerbaijan Grand PrixSunday, 14:00, Digi Sport 1

  • League of Nations: SpainCzech RepublicSunday, 21:45, Digi Sport 1

Later, the movement of the association based in England, which supports the club sponsored by Gigi Becali, proved to be false, and this is also supported by the “Save the Star Association”, which also supports the FCSB.

Even the “Save the Star Association”, which supports the FCSB, claims that the letter from UEFA is a fake

In a statement posted on the official Facebook account, “Asociația Salvați Steaua”, the group led by lawyer Virgil Boglea specified that it is categorically delimited by the action of “Asociaţiei Steaua 1947” related to the so-called letter from UEFA.

Unfortunately, totally surprised by what happened, we find ourselves forced to deny the long-discussed ‘mail’ received by the 1947 Steaua Association ‘from UEFA’, by those who threw this mess on the media market, by those who thought that they can lie and play with such important problems for Steaua fans!

After analyzing the situation created, we inform you with regret that we stop any collaboration with those from the Steaua Association 1947, that we are disgusted by the ‘work’ of the person who spread this fake news (his name is Sergiu Gabriel) and that we are totally against this false news , news that does no good to anyone.

Our association will continue to fight correctly for the promotion of the values ​​acquired by the communities of Steaua fans and will be actively involved in the issue of clarifying the affiliation of the record / name / emblem of the team we love.“, Is also shown in the communiqué of those from the” Save the Star Association “.

The UEFA answer presented by the 1947 Steaua Association could be false

UPDATE 16:00: Some time after the announcement of the 1947 Steaua Association, UEFA would have replied, for GSP.rothat “that email is fake!” Several aspects of the letter presented by FCSB supporters would not be in line with reality, including the electronic signature of the European forum.

Initial news:

The continental forum answered eight questions, and the conclusion is that, according to the FIFA regulations, FCSB is seen as the successor to the team that won the European Champions Cup in 1986.

UPDATE 15:16: The president of the Steaua 1947 Association assures, in his turn, that UEFA’s answer is real: “As an association, we are affiliated with the Football Supporters’ Association. With their help, we have sent several questions to UEFA, which you can find in this press release. From the very beginning, UEFA has told us that the answer it will be late, but we were interested in finding out their point of view.

To those who claim that it is a fake, I send them to forget that I gave the original email, I did not take screenshots, as others did. With the response from UEFA, everyone understands what they think they need to understand.

The difference between the date I received the answer (May 20) and the moment we chose to publish it (June 10) in the press it has to do with our strategy and other legal issues. “stated Mihai Dincăpresident of the Steaua 1947 Association, based in London, for

UPDATE 14:28: The Association of Steaua players 1947 “AS47” (Peluza Sud Steaua) claims that the letter received by the Steaua Association 1947, presented below, was not sent by UEFA, but was a forgery.

On the Facebook page, those from the Steaua 1947 Association also published the eight questions sent. To make the text sent by UEFA easier to understand, here is each question and answer, as follows:

1. Why does UEFA consider that FCSB (formerly FC Steaua București) is the company that continues the football activity by taking over the football team from the Steaua București Football Club Association?

“UEFA complies with and enforces the FIFA rules, especially when it comes to sports cases, as defined in the previous rules. Given that all identification in accordance with the FIFA rules was complied with in both 1998 and 2003, UEFA concludes that after the rules have been complied with, the actions are retroactive and do not in any way affect the identification of the same club. “

2. We ask for an answer regarding the communiqué and the recommendations made to UEFA towards the Romanian Football Federation, and the Romanian Division A College from the 90’s regarding the privatization of the football teams that were under the tutelage of the ministries and implicitly the main reason for this recommendation?

“In the early 1990s, UEFA sent recommendations to UEFA-affiliated associations and federations. UEFA-affiliated national teams, it is specified that any club fully supported by a state ministry should privatize its footballing activity and continue under the leadership of a private individual “.

3. What are the consequences of refusing to privatize teams regardless of the country in question?

“UEFA cannot oblige its affiliated national associations and federations to comply with the recommendations submitted as they are not supported by an article of law, but all recommendations have been implemented and complied with by all UEFA affiliated associations and federations.”

4. Your opinion on the sports record. Is it a case that should be tried in a sports court or is it a case that can be tried in a civil court without finding the articles of law and the time limit contained in the civil code of procedure in that country?

“The right to a footballing record is established by the FIFA Disciplinary Commission (FDC), as well as the recognition of sporting succession.”

5. If a sports record is related to sports continuity and follows the team that made it or the record remains in the old form of organization and implicitly the team gets a new record and a new history even if it continued its sports activity but under the leadership of another form organization?

“According to the effect of the work judged in the case of the record by the FIFA Disciplinary Board, it belongs to the continuous sports activity that carries it out uninterruptedly and does not belong to legal forms.”

6. How many football teams still exist in Europe today that belong to a ministry without going private and what are they?

“According to UEFA-affiliated national associations and federations, today there is no football club that is entirely under the leadership of a state ministry, all of which have been reorganized as private legal entities.”

7. What are the ways in which one form of organization takes over the European coefficient from another form of organization?

“The transfer and transfer of a club membership fee shall be done by recognizing and complying with Article 15, paragraph 4, of the FIFA Rules, and the Disciplinary Board (FDC) will verify compliance with the requirements and otherwise alert national associations and federations. which in turn are required to amend and update the coefficient data. “

8. How does UEFA define a sports record and whether a newly formed team can take over a record from another team that has never stopped playing and continues to exist today?

“A footballing sports record belongs to the continuous sports activity. So if another newly established sports activity would claim a sports record from another uninterrupted sports activity, then the application would be null and void.”was the answer that the Steaua Association 1947 presented as coming from UEFA.

Tags: record , uefa , mark , 1947

Follow news on Google News as well

The new Digi Sport application can be downloaded from